This review is written with a GPL 4.0 license and the rights contained therein shall supersede all TOS by any and all websites in regards to copying and sharing without proper authorization and permissions. Crossposted at WordPress & Blogspot by Bookstooge’s Exalted Permission
Title: Richard III
Author: William Shakespeare
Rating: 3.5 of 5 Stars
Genre: Play
Pages: 312
Words: 90K
Synopsis: |
From Wikipedia
The play begins with Richard of Gloucester describing the re-accession to the throne of his brother, King Edward IV of England, eldest son of the late Richard, Duke of York (implying the year is 1471):
Now is the winter of our discontent
Made glorious summer by this sun of York;
And all the clouds that lour’d upon our house
In the deep bosom of the ocean buried.
Richard is an ugly hunchback, “rudely stamp’d”, “deformed, unfinish’d”, cannot “strut before a wanton ambling nymph”, and says he is “determined to prove a villain / And hate the idle pleasures of these days.” Through a prophecy, that “G of Edward’s heirs the murderer shall be”, he has contrived to have his brother Clarence conducted to the Tower of London (the king interpreted the prophecy as George of Clarence, but the prophecy could just as easily refer to Richard of Gloucester). Speaking to Clarence en route, Richard blames the queen and says that he will himself try to help Clarence. Richard continues plotting:
I’ll marry Warwick’s youngest daughter.
What, though I kill’d her husband and her father?
Lady Anne attends the corpse of Henry VI with Trestle and Berkeley going from St Paul’s Cathedral. She bids them set down the “honourable load” then laments. Richard appears, and Lady Anne says that “Henry’s wounds […] bleed afresh”. He confesses the murder, and she spits at him. He offers himself to her sword, but she drops it. He offers to kill himself at her order, but she accepts his ring. Richard exults at having won her over so and tells the audience that he will discard her once she has served his purpose.
The atmosphere at court is poisonous. The established nobles are at odds with the upwardly mobile relatives of Queen Elizabeth, a hostility fueled by Richard’s machinations. Queen Margaret, Henry VI’s widow, returns, though banished, and she warns the squabbling nobles about Richard, cursing extensively. The nobles, all Yorkists, unite against this last Lancastrian and ignore the warnings.
Richard orders two murderers to kill Clarence in the tower. Clarence relates a distressing dream to his keeper before going to sleep. The murderers arrive with a warrant, and the keeper relinquishes his office. While the murderers are pondering what to do, Clarence wakes. He recognises their purpose and pleads with them. Presuming that Edward has offered them payment, he tells them to go to Gloucester, who will reward them better for having kept him alive. One of the murderers explains that Gloucester hates him and sent them. Pleading again, he is eventually interrupted by “Look behind you, my lord” and stabbing (1478).
The compacted nobles pledge absent enmities before Edward, and Elizabeth asks Edward to receive Clarence into favour. Richard rebukes her, saying: “Who knows not that the gentle duke is dead?”. Edward, who has confessed himself near death, is much upset by this news and led off. Richard blames those attending Edward. Edward IV soon dies (1483), leaving Richard as Protector. Lord Rivers, Lord Grey, and Sir Thomas Vaughan, have been imprisoned. The uncrowned Edward V and his brother are coaxed (by Richard) into an extended stay at the Tower of London.
Assisted by his cousin Buckingham, Richard mounts a campaign to present himself as the true heir to the throne, pretending to be a modest and devout man with no pretensions to greatness. Lord Hastings, who objects to Richard’s accession, is arrested and executed on a trumped-up charge of treason. Richard and Buckingham spread the rumour that Edward’s two sons are illegitimate and therefore have no rightful claim to the throne, and they are assisted by Catesby, Ratcliffe, and Lovell. The other lords are cajoled into accepting Richard as king despite the continued survival of his nephews (the Princes in the Tower).
Richard asks Buckingham to secure the death of the princes, but Buckingham hesitates. Richard then recruits Sir James Tyrrell who kills both children. When Richard denies Buckingham a promised land grant, Buckingham turns against Richard and defects to the side of Henry, Earl of Richmond, who is currently in exile. Richard has his eye on Elizabeth of York, Edward IV’s next remaining heir, and poisons Lady Anne so he can be free to woo the princess. The Duchess of York and Queen Elizabeth mourn the princes’ deaths. Queen Margaret meets them. As predicted, Queen Elizabeth asks Queen Margaret for help in cursing. Later, the Duchess applies this lesson and curses her only surviving son before leaving. Richard asks Queen Elizabeth to help him win her daughter’s hand in marriage. She is not taken in by his eloquence, and stalls him by saying that she will let him know her daughter’s answer in due course.
The increasingly paranoid Richard loses what popularity he had. He faces rebellions, led first by Buckingham and subsequently by the invading Richmond. Buckingham is captured and executed. Both sides arrive for a final battle at Bosworth Field. Prior to the battle, Richard is sleeping and visited by the ghosts of his victims, each telling him to “Despair and die”. They likewise attend and wish victory on Richmond. Richard wakes, screaming “Jesus”, then realises that he is all alone and cannot even pity himself.
At the Battle of Bosworth Field (1485), Lord Stanley (who is also Richmond’s stepfather) and his followers desert Richard, whereupon Richard calls for the execution of George Stanley, hostage and Lord Stanley’s son. But this does not happen, as the battle is in full swing, and Richard is at a disadvantage. Richard is unhorsed on the field, and cries out, “A horse, a horse, my kingdom for a horse”. Richmond kills Richard and claims the throne as Henry VII.
My Thoughts: |
I ended up enjoying this more than I thought I would. Richard is a despicable character and I enjoyed seeing his rise to power because I knew his fall was sudden and immediate (at least in the play. In real life, no idea). At the same time, he is a mesmerizing character and it was baffling to see others fall into his clutches because of his honeyed tongue while his actions were in direct contradiction. He was a great example of unchecked power
However, this was very long. A play at over 300 pages seems excessive to me and trying to cram Richard’s entire rise and fall into one play, well, Shakespeare gave Henry VI 3 plays for goodness sake!Of course, if somethings had been cut altogether, it probably would have been better.
This play, while I enjoyed it, made me realize that my capacity for Shakespeare has definite limits. As such, I’m going to give him another break until next year. Then I’ll have to decide whether to do a 6month stint or to space them further apart (or is that “farther”? That’s one of those things I simply cannot get my head about. I’m good with “to”, “two” and “too” but further/farther, I’m lost). Any thoughts?
Is this the one where he fights Ivan Drago?
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, this is the with Richard, not Henry. He gets drunk at a bar and flicks peanuts at a mirror.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Doe he have a robot butler and fight Mr T?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not in this edition. Are you thinking of the alternate folio put out by that crackpot, Jacobi Reeves?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep Booky, ‘farther’ is for physical distance, like ‘he went farther down the road’ and further is for mental distance like ‘he wouldn’t discuss it any further’.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks! I’ll have to see if that helps me in the future 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well, Henry VI was king for forty years and Richard III for less than a couple (I think). This is a popular play, but hard to follow if you don’t know all the ins and outs and the relations of the different players.
Further and farther in some cases can be indistinguishable, but what Fraggle says is the general rule. Though there are exceptions. I would have used “further” where you did, though I guess if you said farther it wouldn’t have been wrong.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well, the main thing is that when Shakespeare writes King Bookstooge, there had better be at least 5 parts. Or I’m digging up his corpse and salting and burning his bones!
Thanks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Like in Star Wars when Darth Vader says Luke, ‘I am your further?’
LikeLiked by 2 people
No, like when you go for a drive to see the Further of Forth.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Is this the one where he goes to Afghanistan and blows up a helicopter with one shot?
LikeLiked by 1 person
DAAAAANG. you know your alternate text’s super good! That’s not in the canon story, but the directors cut has that scene written back in.
Richard has his famous “A rifle, a rifle, my kingdom for a rifle” scene, which alongside his “horsey” speech, shows which one is the better. Who wants horses when you can blow up helicopters with a rifle?
But Shakespeare knew his audience I guess, so he stuck to what they knew…
LikeLiked by 1 person
The bottom line is that Shakespeare’s franchises never reached the heights of Stallone’s. That why they call Stallone the Bard; he’s the best!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s his middle name, right? Sylvester Bard Stallone?
LikeLike
Richard III is essentially based on Tudor propaganda since 1485, however once Elizabeth I died it was safe for the pro-Richard histories to start popping up. However Shakespeare is such a good playwright that his titular character is the one that general histories go with. Did Richard III order his nephews killed? Probably not, BUT as their uncle he was responsible for their safety by all societal and cultural norms so if a third-party killed them while he was king he would have some responsibility for failing to safeguard them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Matt 🙂
I guess Shakespeare really could write then. I wish my blog was half so well written, hahahahaahhaa 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That does seem long. And my experience with Shakespeare is pretty limited – I’ve never thought of actually reading the plays, I guess, but I can see the appeal. Although I’d probably burn out quick 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, I’m learning I have to pace myself quite differently from regular novels 🙂
LikeLike
Rise and fall stories have a certain charm, I find. It’s how the character deals with it all that makes me most intrigued too. How much “psychological” do you get with these plays? Do you get inside the head of characters or do you have to read between the lines most of the time?
LikeLiked by 1 person
this is really a vanity project and I try to not think too hard about just why exactly I’m doing this 😀
Since they are plays I just read them to get through them.
LikeLike